|
D.O.H. Hearing Impaired
by: Joseph Van Harken
East Village bar owner
Harold Kramer at first thought the New
York City Department of Health's "repeal and reenact"
hearing Friday, March 7 was promising. His hope dimmed as he and
a handful other anti ban advocates learned that the purpose of the
meeting was not to discuss the lawfulness of the Smoke
Free Air Act of 2002. Rather it was to listen to the public's
sentiments regarding the regulations, meaning how the law will be
enforced.
"This is not a debate
about the law. The law is a done deal, there's no reason to bring
the troops here today and have a big fight," said Bob Bookman,
an attorney who represents the New York Nightlife Association. "But
what we can do is talk about the regulations- the Department of
Health cannot promulgate the regulations to make the law lighter
or harsher than what the City Council voted in. "
Specifically, Bookman said
the Department of Health determined they can revoke the license
of an establishment owner who is ticketed more than three times
within one year. Bookman said that language was not specified by
the City Council and that if it were the Council's intent, the Council
would have deliberately included it in the draft of the Act.
"Bookman doesn't know
the law as well as we do," said Martha Robinson, Assistant
General Counsel for the New York City Department of Health. "Concerning
many laws and regulations, we have the power to revoke a license
if it can be proven that there is a willful intent to commit a violation."
Bookman and about 20 other
public attendees were each given a three-minute window to formally
address the Department of Health panel. The panel then will take
into consideration what was said before it enacts the regulation
portion of the law, which goes into effect on March 30, 2003.
The speakers were split
into two basic groups: those for the law and those against it.
Speaking on behalf of the
law were representatives from the American
Lung Association, the American
Cancer Society, the American
Heart Association. They called for tighter language to close
possible exemption loopholes and to state specifically that it would
be illegal for unwrapped ashtrays to be present anywhere inside
an establishment. Furthermore, they asked that the regulations also
include specifications for owners to designate outdoor boundaries
where patrons may congregate to smoke.
Other representatives of
minority business owners, who also supported the law, asked for
the panel to provide sings in with non-English translations that
they can hang explaining the law and who may be penalized.
Who may be penalized was
another concern Bookman raised. He called for clarification on what
to do if a patron breaks the law and smokes anyway. The current
Act states it is the establishment owner's responsibility to enforce
the law, but Bookman said the Act of 1995 states that the person
committing the violation can be fined up to $100. Which will it
be now?
Those speaking against
the law, like Kramer and Lower East Side bar owner Sandee Wright
who owns the Whiskey Ward, complained about the burdens unjustly
put on their shoulders. They feel it is not fair for them to be
in charge of policing their own clientele, which is made up of more
than 80 percent smokers for each bar. For a full transcript of their
speeches, click
here for Kramer's and here
for Wright's.
Other questions focused
on how the law will actually be enforced. Sandra Mullin, associate
commissioner of the New York City Department of Health said the
Department is in the process of hiring and training around 12 new
inspectors who will target the evening hours. She hopes the new
crew will be ready by March 30.
"We want to generate
revenue," Mullin said.
To achieve this goal, beside
the smoking ban, the inspectors also will enforce other health code
regulations, Mullin said.
How it all works out will
be interesting, Bookman said. The first establishment to get its
license revoked will be involved in a big lawsuit that challenges
the law, he said.
"That's nice,"
Wright said. "But I sure don't want to be that first bar. "
-30-
|